Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Root Causes

While some people are debating whether our current economic crisis was caused by amorphous human emotions like "greed" or "evil", I submit that at the root, the issue is something far deeper - a system that encouraged and incented the behaviour that has caused such turmoil. And all of the bailouts and purchasing of "toxic debt" will only worsen it in the long run.

The problem is with "money":

Testimony of Dr. Lawrence Parks on the MT Sound Money Bill (HB 639) from Constitutional Money on Vimeo.

(h/t to Strike the Root)

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 23, 2009

Death to America

Fuck you Fox News. Fuck you in the neck.

And a big Fuck You to any Canadian Conservatives who still think these mealy mouthed, imperial cocksuckers are our 'friends'. Because apparently stating the title of this post makes me a terrorist lover, but besmirching the reputation, valour and abilities our our soldiers on the same day that 4 more give their lives so the US can continue its clusterfuck in Iraq is just fine.

I'd invite these so-called "journalists" to repeat those words to the guys on the tarmac in Kandahar. Hell, I'd invite the chicken hawk cowards to even show up there.

Not very rational and not very reasonable. I don't care. I won't support for a minute my brother giving up his life for ungrateful, ignorant and arrogant slugs like those. They are on their own and deserve everything they get.

Labels: ,

Friday, March 13, 2009


Lets say one day, I grab a young man off the streets, take him home and lock him in my basement. This young man isn't very nice and has been hanging out with the wrong crowd, so he isn't very well liked.

Lets say that I keep him locked up in a 6' x 6' room in my basement, with a metal cot and an open toilet. I wake him at the same time everyday, tell him when he can sleep, when he can eat, when he can talk.

Lets say further, that on an unpredictable yet regular basis, I steal what little possession I allow him to keep, I beat him, I feed him second rate food and occasionally rape him.

Lets say further that I allow my friends to come over and rape him when they feel like it too - in exchange for cigarettes, booze or food.

Lets say that I do this for 10 years or so, every day, before he finally escapes.

What would you think of me?

More importantly, what would you think of what happened to this young man. Is his treatment horrible? Evil? Will he be remotely normal after he escapes?

Would you say he had it easy?

Of course not.

I'm curious then why so many people seem to think doing this exact thing to Momin Khawaja is "letting him off easy". Check out the comments over at CBC.

I make no apologies for Khawaja, nor do I remotely support what he did or his causes. In reality, he has already been in prison for 5 years and was sentenced to an additional 10 1/2 years for his actions. That means his sentence is 15 1/2 years for his crimes and he will not be eligible for parole for another 5 years, until he has served 10 years. That doesn't mean he'll get it, it means simply he'll be allowed to ask, to simply make the request.

For a guy who never actually harmed another individual or caused any damage, that seems like a pretty stiff and fair sentence.

And yet everywhere you turn, you see so-called "law and order" conservative blowhards claiming that the sentence is "too light" or demonstrates that our legal system is too lenient.


Those commenters at CBC and at the Blogging Tories are the same people that wouldn't last 45 minutes in a stuck elevator, yet claim 15 1/2 years in a prison is "too light". These are the same people that wouldn't last 10 days inside the dark pits of anal rape we call Milhaven or Kingston, yet seem to think 10 years in such a place is "getting off with a slap on the wrist".

Perhaps Khawaja should have gotten more - I don't know, because like right-wing howler monkeys, I haven't read the actual decision yet. But that doesn't mean 10+ years in one of our federal pens isn't punishment. It is. It is 10 years of horror and anyone who thinks differently is an utter and complete, ignorant fool whose mean-spirited and uninformed opinions should be utterly ignored or viciously ridiculed.

Khawaja got what he deserved and trust me, he'll pay for his crimes, whether the vengeful right thinks he will or not.

Just because the bigots and authoritarians could exact their sadistic revenge, doesn't mean justice hasn't been served. It has.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

On "Going Galt"

From Red Tory, we discover the new rage in the right-o-sphere, especially in the US, is the idea of "Going Galt". Essentially, people on the right, of the so-called "productive class" are being encouraged to emulate John Galt in Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and to go on strike, to withdraw their productive genius and capacity in order to "starve the beast." The expectation is that the governemnt and society will collapse and then people will beg them to return.

In principle, I agree with them. I think its perfectly justifiable for anyone to withdraw their consent and support of any government or institution they do not agree with or explicity consent to. It is the basis of direct action. In fact, I have called for it many times in this blog - stop paying taxes, do not obey laws or regulations you do not explicit agree with. I think it is a powerful tool the left whould use more often.

The problem is, and perhaps I'm being terribly cynical, is that I don't think they really believe it. Rather than an act liberation for all people, the right-wingers, with their half-baked understanding of Galt's passage, want to use it to punish their enemies. Curious that, while Bush also called for $750 billion in corporate welfare and bailouts, no one was screaming to "Go Galt" then. But now, with Obama in office, its is suddenly the thing to do. I wonder who they plan to put in charge after their plan suceeds?

Strangely, they really aren't "Going Galt" striclty speaking. In the novel, the "leaders and innovators in industry" remove themselves from society and flee to "Galt's Gulch" to live apart and out of the reach of the society of collectivists and parasites they feel is destroying them. But the proponents of "Going Galt" aren't proposing that. Instead, they are merely asking people to stop making money and bring their income's down to less than $250 000 USD. Or to retire early. Yeah, that'll show 'em.

And I am puzzled by whom they classify as the "productive class" and the "parasites". Seems that Dr. Helen Smith, wife of Instapundit's Glenn Reynolds is recommending that the "rich" (assuming all of the "rich" are the productive class) stop spending, stop tipping wait staff and leave them nasty notes. Because, it seems, wait staff are parasites and there is no better way to bring down the Obama administration than to ostracize most of the American working class.

Or something. I'm still trying to figure out how mouth-pieces like Smith, or Michelle Malkin (who had no problem when Dubya was in office) think they are the "productive class" while wait staff and other low-income service workers, are "parasites."

Really, it merely displays their sense of entitlement and elitism (remember when that was supposed to describe Obama?). They are so sure they are the reason for everyone's sucess, that they feel they need to punish everyone else. They follow a "fuehrer principle" or the idea that there are "great men" who are all productive and the mass of the rest of us who must be lead and ruled. And now, like petulant children, they are going to teach us a lesson by withholding that desparately needed leadership. That is the utter elitist mindset and hubris of the "Go Galt" crowd.

And in perhaps the greatest irony of all, you have conservatives-right wingers calling for a strike, based on a character and philosophy of Ayn Rand. Let that sink in a minute - Randian Collective Action.

Consider that our current finacial crisis was actually brought about by a Randian - Alan Greenspan - who used the centrally controlled and planned Federal Reserve system to increase the money supply and artificially inflate the credit bubble in the first place. Will the "productive class" leaving do anything if the Fed can simply create money out of thin air, rather than rely on tax income? Not likely.

If these guys were serious, they would ACTUALLY "Go Galt" - remove themselves from society to an enclave and refuse to pay taxes or follow regulations or laws. Indeed, they could even indulge in what Agorists call the "counter economy" - buy and sell products and services off the books. Its a way to continue living as you have, but to simply ignore the state.

Apparently though, the "Go Galt" folks merely want people to be poorer. As has been said elsewhere, this looks like a marketing slogan, rather than a grassroots movement. Can you smell the astroturf? Seem that people like Beck (Glenn Beck, not Billy Beck), Rush, Malkin and the rest are merely latching onto this in order to use it for partisan political purposes. The minute they regain power, or find that "going Galt" can also be used against a Republican administration, they'll denounce it as "un-American" and "treason" - remember after 9-11 it was your patriotic duty to keep working and spending, to keep the ecomomy going.

In short, the fascists are trying to use the ideas of liberty to gain power. Its exploitation and manipulation of the highest, most politically cynical order.

I'd also like to share with the right-o-sphere some other little tidbits of Rand they might find interesting:

On Conservatives:

The conservatives want freedom to act in the material realm; they tend to oppose government control of production, of industry, of trade, of business, of physical goods, of material wealth. But they advocate government control of man’s spirit, i.e., man’s consciousness; they advocate the State’s right to impose censorship, to determine moral values, to create and enforce a governmental establishment of morality, to rule the intellect...The conservatives see man as a body freely roaming the earth, building sand piles or factories—with an electronic computer inside his skull, controlled from Washington.

On Christianity:

What is the nature of the guilt that your teachers call his Original Sin? What are the evils man acquired when he fell from a state they consider perfection? Their myth declares that he ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge -- he acquired a mind and became a rational being. It was the knowledge of good and evil -- he became a moral being. He was sentenced to earn his bread by his labor -- he became a productive being. He was sentenced to experience desire -- he acquired the capacity of sexual enjoyment. The evils for which they damn him are reason, morality, creativeness, joy -- all the cardinal values of his existence. It is not his vices that their myth of man's fall is designed to explain and condemn, it is not his errors they they hold as his guilt, but the essence of his nature as man. Whatever he was -- that robot, in the Garden of Eden, who existed without mind, without values, without labor, without love -- he was not man...

Still want to "Go Galt"? Be my guest.

Labels: , ,